Comments (12)
Leave a Reply
We have teamed up with Virgin Trains’ ‘Don’t Go Zombie’ Google Street View game to offer readers the chance to win £100 Amazon voucher.
For a chance to win Night of the Living Trekkies just tell us who would win in a fight, zombie Kirk or zombie Picard and why?
Win Capcom's latest zombie game, Dead Rising 2, by simply telling us what your ultimate combo weapon would be.
How to Survive a Zombie Apocalypse's head honcho, Dr. Dale, has released an A - Z guide for staying alive in a zombocalypse.
At some point, cord is going to be essential for your survival in the zombie-infested world of tomorrow and you’ll be glad you learned how to make your own.
The aim of Cowboys Vs. Zombies is to protect your fledgling town against waves of zombies coming in across the desert.
The first The Walking Dead artist was Tony Moore who is quite amazing. So Charlie Adlard is ONE OF the Walking Dead artist. :) I’m more of a Tony Moore fan myself for his detailed work. Check out TWD Vol. 1 – the art is outstanding.
Yeah, but as Tony Moore drew about 7 and did the first 25 covers (if memory serves) and we’re now 70 issues in, I think it’s fair to say that Charlie Adlard is THE artist for The Walking Dead.
charlie adlard SUCKS SO BAD compared to tony moore. its sooooo sad
Agreed. I can’t believe the difference in the art, Charlie Adler sucked the soul out of that comic.
@ugh Nice try Tony! lol
Seems like a pretty wild statement though. What is it that you don’t like about Adlard?
Well charlie adlard art is sloppy. He tries to hide his flaws by using a “shade” overkill.
Proportions are never right (and it’s a style issue) thats why he sucks. I’ll never forget the shock I had, when I opened issue #7…
I agree, Adlard’s art is garbage compared with Moore’s. I stopped reading TWD for a long time because I was so irritated. My biggest problem with Adlard is that he is not consistent- You can barely tell which character is which and even individual characters change from panel to panel because he can’t f-cking draw them. In a character driven comic with a dozen players in any given issue, it’s ludicrous. And he really hasn’t gotten any better over time.
I agree with the other comments. Charlie Adler’s art is not nearly as impressive as Moore’s. It’s the reason I stopped reading The Walking Dead. I loved Tony Moore’s style. Adler is sloppy. His landscape and architectural work is alright, but he sucks at drawing faces and he has a very poor grasp of light and shadow.
Sae:
I googled “Charlie Adler sucks” and found this comment thread. I was saying the exact same thing. Within one issue Rick looks like 20 different people. And that goes with all the characters. The drawing is terrible. I say to myself as I’m reading “god damn he sucks.” blech.
haha thats a pretty funny thing to say considering his name is acctually known and your isnt. You say his drawings suck well i bet his are alot better than yours.
@lezlofezlo What a stupid and pointless statement. Did anyone claim to be an artist? And how does saying Adlard’s art is better than that of the previous poster change the fact that it is sub par compared to the work of Moore?
Completely agree. I barely started the series after hearing such great things about it, and when I opened issue #7 I was in for a surprise. So far I’ve had trouble finishing it. It feels like a different story all together. Moore’s characters were the ones I was connecting with, not Adlard’s.