Survival Of The Dead Poster By Charlie Adlard

5 May

survival poster Survival Of The Dead Poster By Charlie Adlard

For those of you who don’t know (and can’t tell from the poster), Charlie Adlard is the artist for Robert Kirkman’s The Walking Dead and has created this special Survival of the Dead poster for it’s on demand release.

pixel Survival Of The Dead Poster By Charlie Adlard
Saving you from the Zombocalypse one post at a time. Follow us on Twitter, join us on Facebook or download our iPhone App (opens in iTunes). Discuss this on the forums or even write for us!

Read more articles by Zombie Command »

Comments (12)

 

  1. Hells says:

    The first The Walking Dead artist was Tony Moore who is quite amazing. So Charlie Adlard is ONE OF the Walking Dead artist. :) I’m more of a Tony Moore fan myself for his detailed work. Check out TWD Vol. 1 – the art is outstanding.

  2. Yeah, but as Tony Moore drew about 7 and did the first 25 covers (if memory serves) and we’re now 70 issues in, I think it’s fair to say that Charlie Adlard is THE artist for The Walking Dead.

  3. ugh says:

    charlie adlard SUCKS SO BAD compared to tony moore. its sooooo sad

  4. @ugh Nice try Tony! lol

    Seems like a pretty wild statement though. What is it that you don’t like about Adlard?

  5. evilnerd says:

    Well charlie adlard art is sloppy. He tries to hide his flaws by using a “shade” overkill.

    Proportions are never right (and it’s a style issue) thats why he sucks. I’ll never forget the shock I had, when I opened issue #7…

  6. sae says:

    I agree, Adlard’s art is garbage compared with Moore’s. I stopped reading TWD for a long time because I was so irritated. My biggest problem with Adlard is that he is not consistent- You can barely tell which character is which and even individual characters change from panel to panel because he can’t f-cking draw them. In a character driven comic with a dozen players in any given issue, it’s ludicrous. And he really hasn’t gotten any better over time.

  7. Fliggity says:

    I agree with the other comments. Charlie Adler’s art is not nearly as impressive as Moore’s. It’s the reason I stopped reading The Walking Dead. I loved Tony Moore’s style. Adler is sloppy. His landscape and architectural work is alright, but he sucks at drawing faces and he has a very poor grasp of light and shadow.

  8. Kevin says:

    Sae:

    I googled “Charlie Adler sucks” and found this comment thread. I was saying the exact same thing. Within one issue Rick looks like 20 different people. And that goes with all the characters. The drawing is terrible. I say to myself as I’m reading “god damn he sucks.” blech.

  9. lezlofezlo says:

    haha thats a pretty funny thing to say considering his name is acctually known and your isnt. You say his drawings suck well i bet his are alot better than yours.

  10. Aeon says:

    @lezlofezlo What a stupid and pointless statement. Did anyone claim to be an artist? And how does saying Adlard’s art is better than that of the previous poster change the fact that it is sub par compared to the work of Moore?

  11. Dani says:

    Completely agree. I barely started the series after hearing such great things about it, and when I opened issue #7 I was in for a surprise. So far I’ve had trouble finishing it. It feels like a different story all together. Moore’s characters were the ones I was connecting with, not Adlard’s.

Leave a Reply